Archive for the 'Our Rights Online' CategoryPage 3 of 3

So Kinners, jetzt isses soweit…

Eigentlich wollte ich als Nächste wieder ein schönes photo aus der Mensa posten, aber es ist etwas Wichtigeres dazwischen gekommen:

Ich hab in letzter Zeit angefangen meine Mails zu signieren und zu verschlüsseln. Wie sich herausgestellt hat, gerade rechtzeitig. Was ich bis jetzt noch nicht richtig realisiert hatte, ist, dass alle deutschen provider ab Anfang nächsten Jahres verpflichtet sind, den E-Mailverkehr komplett zu überwachen.

Bevor mich also jemand, dem ich schon versucht habe zu erklären worum es geht, fragt, warum man denn jetzt eigentlich E-Mails verschlüsseln soll, möge er/sie bitte diesen Text auf heise-online lesen:

Verpflichtung zur E-Mail-Überwachung trifft die providerbranche hart

Für ungeduldige das wichtigste Im Überblick:

[Quote] Für viele Internetanbieter gibt es derzeit nur ein Thema: Sie stöhnen über den bedrohlich näher rückenden Starttermin für die Überwachung des E-Mail-Verkehrs. Die von der Bundesregierung gesetzte Frist für den Lauschangriff auf die elektronische post am 1. Januar 2005 “drückt sehr”, weiß Michael Rotert, präsident der europäischen providervereinigung EuroISpA. [...] Die entsprechenden Regelungen in der mehrfach novellierten Telekommunikations-Überwachungsverordnung (TKÜV) sind zwar bereits seit Mai 2003 in ihrer jetzigen Form in Kraft. Doch für Mailserver gilt eine Übergangsregelung, die zum Jahresende ausläuft. [Quote]

Der Artikel ist zwar schon vom 5. November 04, aber ich habe ihn eben erst auf bitfever entdeckt. . Verschlüsselung gibt es hier. Wer gar nicht klar kommt, soll jemand um Hilfe bitten, der es weiss.

Im Westen nichts Neues

War gestern bei “Kompensation oder Kontrolle? - Die Musikindustrie nach der mp3-Revolution“. Das Thema klang sehr spannend und neben den Verfechtern einer sogenannten Kulturflatrate war auch der Syndikus der deutschen phonoindustrie da. Leider krankte das panel (gibt es da ein schickes deutsches Wort für?) daran, dass die Leute aneinander vorbeigeredet haben, nicht wirklich die Fragen des Diskussionsleiters beantworteten und sich manchmal selbst widersprachen. Am spannendsten waren die Beiträge eines Herrn Kröber, der Direktor bei der GEMA ist. Nach seiner Meinung sollten die Künstler zwar für jedes einzelne Musikstück, das aus dem Internet gezogen wird, bezahlt werden, aber andrerseits gibt er auch zu, dass dies aufgrund der Entwicklung, die bis jetzt stattgefunden hat, nicht mehr durchsetzungsfähig sein wird. Die vorgestellte Flatrate hält er aber auch für ungenügend.

Fazit: Es ist spannend und teilweise amüsant solchen öffentlichen Diskussionen beizuwohnen, der prozent an neuen und/oder wichtigen Aussagen ist sehr gering, da die Teilnehmer oft darauf bedacht sind ihre position darzustellen, statt zu diskutieren.

Spread the Word!

Old News, but still: Firefox 1.0 was released a two(?) days ago. The developers hope for 1.000.000 downloads within ten days from the release. So this is me spreading the word:

Maybe he needs a gmail account? (^_^)

From a mail posted to bugtraq:

[Quote] —–Original Message—–
From: DR
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 1:10 AM
To: bugtraq [at] securityfocus [dot] com
Subject: Caveat Lector: Beastie Boys Evil

Well I truly regret actually purchasing a copy of the new Beastie Boys albumto support them.

It seems that Capitol Records has some sort of new copy protection system, that automatically, silently, installs “helpful” copy protection software on

MacOS and Windows as soon as you insert the CD into default systems. I’m not sure exactly what it does yet, but I am sure regreting actually purchasing said media now… they don’t deserve my money if they choose to pull stupid stunts like this. Installing software without your permission sounds like viral malware behaviour to me. I certainly hope the AV companies put signatures into their products for this crap.

They include some sort of uninstaller buried on there for Windows, but I see no such thing for MacOS. If anyone has disassembled the aforementioned malware already and can save us some time with instructions on how to remove it… thanks in advance.

caveat emptor,
–dr [Quote]

And I thought these guys were cool.

[Quote] Your Rights Online: Beastie Boys’ New Album Silently Installs DRM Code

from the but-the-beastie-boys-are-so-countercultural dept.

“After more than five years, the Beastie Boys have released a new album. It seems that the retail disc is bundled with a copy protection autoinstaller which silently silently puts itself onto the listener’s computer. Many listeners are up in arms and some are venting their frustrations on the band’s website.[Quote]

I’m so not going to buy there album.

*pfft*

[from /.]

Why? I didn’t knew!

From an Interview with Jack Valenti, head of the MpAA:

[Quote] TT: No, you said four years ago that people under Linux should use one of these licensed players that would be available soon. They’re still not available — it’s been four years.

JV: Well why aren’t they available? I don’t know, because I don’t make Linux machines.

Let me put it in my simple terms. If you take something that doesn’t belong to you, that’s wrong. Number two, if you design your own machine, you can’t fuss at people, because you’re one of just a few. How many Linux users are there?

TT: About two million.

JV: Well, I can’t believe there’s not any — there must be a reason for… Let me find out about that. You bring up an interesting question — I don’t know the answer to that… Well, you’re telling me a lot of things I don’t know. [Quote]

[via boingboing.net]

Anti-copying measures on photoshop and Hp printers

I it was reported a while ago that photoshop has the built-in ability to detect that an image is of American currency. Now a Richard M. Smith at bugtraq posted that many Hp printers can do the same. If trying to print currency they’ll do just an inch of the picture and then abort the print job. The drivers contain the URL http://www.rulesforuse.org. After describing the odd behaviour, he poses some interesting questions:

[Quote]
1. Besides graphic programs and printer drivers, what
other kinds of software is this currency anti-copy
technology being embedded in?

2. Are companies being required to include currency
anti-copying technology in their products? If not,
what incentives are being offered to companies to
include the technology on a voluntary basis?

3. Will future versions of this technology, “phone home”
to the rulesforuse.org Web site with details about
a violation of the currency copying rules? It would
be very easy to include an email address, name of the
image file, software version number, etc. embedded in
a URL to the rulesforuse.org when a violation has been
detected.
[Quote]

Complete Mail, contains exact description and points to several news articles about photoshop:
[Spoilers] Hp printers and currency anti-copying measures
By “Richard M. Smith”

Hi,

Last week, the Associated press reported that Adobe has incorporated
anti-copying technology in their photoshop CS software which prevents users
from opening image files of U.S. and European currency. Here’s the article:

Adobe admits to currency blocker
[Link]

(http://www.sanmateocountytimes.com/Stories/0,1413,87~11271~1 882929,00.html)

I did some investigating on my own computer and discovered that Hp has also
been shipping currency anti-copying software in their printer drives since
at least the summer of 2002. I have an Hp 130 photo printer and found the
string “http://www.rulesforuse.org” embedded in the driver.

According to a few newsgroup messages posted in 2002 and 2003, folks are
seeing this URL printed out when they attempt to print images of certain
types of bills. An Hp printer with this anti-copying technology only prints
out an inch of a currency image before aborting the print job.

Here is a list of Hp printers which appear to have this anti-copy technology
embedded in their Windows printer drivers:

Hp 130
Hp 230
Hp 7150
Hp 7345
Hp 7350
Hp 7550

I suspect the list of affected Hp printers is much longer.

I located these printer drivers simply by searching all files in my Windows
and program Files directories for the string “rulesforuse”. If other folks
run this same experiment, please let me know of other programs which appear
to contain currency anti-copy technology.

There are some unanswered questions raised by this quiet effort by U.S. and
European governments to turn home computers into anti-counterfeiting “cops”:

1. Besides graphic programs and printer drivers, what
other kinds of software is this currency anti-copy
technology being embedded in?

2. Are companies being required to include currency
anti-copying technology in their products? If not,
what incentives are being offered to companies to
include the technology on a voluntary basis?

3. Will future versions of this technology, “phone home”
to the rulesforuse.org Web site with details about
a violation of the currency copying rules? It would
be very easy to include an email address, name of the
image file, software version number, etc. embedded in
a URL to the rulesforuse.org when a violation has been
detected.

Richard M. Smith
[Link]
[/Spoilers]

Reply by oppermann {at} pipeline {dot} ch
[Spoilers]
More disturbing is that simply blocking the printing of currencies is
not the right thing. There are in fact only limits on how close a
currency is allowed to be reproduced. There is no law or regulation
(at least for the Euro) that prohibits reproducing the bank notes in
general.

For example you are explicitly allowed to reproduce Euro notes if:

1. it is only reproduced electronically (ie. Website) when the
resolution is not higher than 72dpi

2. it is only printed one-sided and it is at most 75% or at least
125% the size of the original

3. it is printed double-sided and it is at most 50% or at least
200% the size of the original

4. is is printed on something that clearly is not paper and does
not look and feel like real bank note paper (here it can be a
100% size reproduction)

5. some more possibilities…

Thus a wholesale blocking of the printing or editing of currency
images is neither required nor correct and denies legal and fair
use.

Reproducing at least the Euro currency IS LEGAL provided the rules
are followed.
[/Spoilers]

Edited on Jan 19th 2004, 22:13 by jeck




Stoppt die Vorratsdatenspeicherung! Jetzt klicken & handeln!Willst du auch bei der Aktion teilnehmen? Hier findest du alle relevanten Infos und Materialien: